Atheists Before Darwin
By Landon Haynes
In his 1986 book “The Blind Watchmaker” Richard Dawkins recalls expressing his
position that he couldn’t imagine being an atheist before Darwin. As it happens,
there WERE atheists before Darwin, and theories of evolution go back to ancient
Greece. It’s curious, because he also believes God is in itself a bad
explanation (would it still be if evolution were false?). It’s a shame if Mr.
Dawkins (who I have recently met) is unaware of it, but there is a great legacy
of atheist pioneers that helped forge the modern world and cut through the fog
and terror of religious faith. As such, I was inspired to add my own small
contribution to masterful works such as “Doubt: A History” by Jennifer Hecht,
“Battling The Gods: Atheism in the Classical World” by Tim Whitmarsh, “A History
of Disbelief” by Jonathan Miller,BBC, and “2000 Years of Disbelief” by James
Haught to make this legacy more widely known.
Since the most potent and consequential historical atheism before Darwin
happened during the 1700’s and the Age of Enlightenment, and since that is the
era I’m most personally interested and read in, that will be the primary focus
of this piece. Much of my source material comes from books I could not recommend
enough, such as any book on the Enlightenment by Jonathan Israel or Peter Gay,
“The Age of Voltaire” by Will and Ariel Durant, and particularly “A Wicked
Company: The Forgotten Radicalism of the European Enlightenment” by Philip Blom.
And though there were few outright atheists in America, several figures came
close and drank deeply of the wider Enlightenment movement, as such books like
“Nature’s God: The Heretical Origins of the American Republic” by Mathew
Stewart, “Moral Minority” by Brooke Allen, and “Freethinkers: A History of
American Secularism” by Susan Jacoby very much merit reading, together with
letters of the American founders such as Jefferson and all the original material
by the authors henceforth mentioned. Jefferson and Franklin both lived in France
and knew and owned the works of the first great atheist authors in history.
Many of us know of names like the ancient Roman poet Lucretius who sparked the
skepticism and naturalism of the Renaissance and beyond with the atomism of
Democritus and Epicurus. There was Protagoras who stated he knew not whether the
gods existed and many other great skeptical philosophers in ancient Greece
(where the school of skepticism itself was born). By the Hellenisitc age
Clitomachus and Carneades had identified atheism as a coherent movement and
distinct philosophical position with its own deep history and varieties and
compiled “On Atheism”, a compendium of anti-religious thought. But after this,
aside from some atheistic traditions that always endured in the Eastern world,
the atheistic trail goes cold in the dark ages of faith before the central time
of our focus here. If we skip ahead, we do indeed know about the proliferation
of a continuous plethora of atheist names from the time of Darwin onward (Freud,
Nietzsche, Godwin, Marx, Sartre, Camus, Russell),to the point where John Stuart
Mill could talk of how astonished the world would be if it knew how many of its
greatest “ornaments” were total unbelievers in religion, though not all of these
were atheists in any way due to Darwin. Today, there are more ornaments than
ever, from celebrities like Brad Pitt and Daniel Radcliffe to philanthropists
like Bill Gates and Warren Buffet to 90 plus percent of the National Academy of
Science and its counterparts.
But going back and focusing on our main era of interest, already there were
enough atheists in the 1600’s for Pierre Bayle to propose that a society of
atheists is entirely possible and acceptable and no worse than a society of
Christians, and for Francis Bacon to grant that “a little philosophy inclineth
men to atheism.” The same century saw Baruch Spinoza’s pantheistic philosophy of
rejection of all religion and equating of god making a monumental and indelible
impact as well as Thomas Hobbe’s thoroughly atheistic materialism. We
concentrate first on a quiet priest who seemed to lay the groundwork and first
articulate many of the same points that would be touched upon equally as
eloquently by the “new” atheists centuries later.
Jean Meslier:
Voltaire tried to make him into a deist, but once the actual manuscripts of his
treatise “My Testament” which he left behind after his death came to light, the
first complete and unambiguous statement of atheism caught fire.Jean Meslier
(1678-1733) lived a lie as a priest in Champagne, France for his whole life, no
one suspected what he secretly thought and put to paper. Every year he gave to
the poor from his salary. As all the atheists immediately following him made the
same points, it’s worth stopping to cover some of Meslier’s ideas in detail. In
his testament there was Biblical criticism, pointing out the great differences
in the genealogies in Matthew and Luke, and asking how this is if they were both
authored by God. Why do they both end with Joseph, who was soon to be excused
from begetting Jesus? Why should the Son of God be complimented on being the son
of David, an arrant adulterer and bandit? He pointed out that according to many
the vast majority were doomed for hell, so heaven is hardly a consolation and
apparently the devil has won, and God inexplicably sacrificed himself to himself
to save us from himself for nothing. He asked: How could any civilized person
believe in a god who condemns his creatures to everlasting hell? He pondered if
there was ever a stranger God than this that for thousands of years kept himself
hidden, and heard without any clear and visible response the prayers and praises
of billions. He is supposed to be infinitely wise but his empire is ridden with
disorder and destruction. He is supposed to be good, but he punishes like an
inhuman fiend. He is supposed to be just be he lets the wicked prosper and his
saints be tortured to death.
“All children are atheists” he writes, “they have no idea of God”. “Very few
people would have a god if care had not been taken to give them one.” He
continues: “Who made God? I say to you that matter acts on itself.” Of Jesus he
writes: ” We see in him a fanatic, who, preaching to the wretched, advises them
to be poor, to combat and extinguish nature, to hate pleasure, to seek
suffering, to despise themselves. He tells them to leave their family, all the
ties of life, to follow him. What beautiful morality! It must be divine because
it is impracticable for men.” Meslier, like D’Holbach and Diderot after him,
proposes a common Enlightenment theme that priests and kings have formed an
alliance to keep people under an oppressive and obedient absolute rule in fear.
He asks: “Whom does the idea of God overwhelm? Weak men disappointed and
disgusted with the world, persons whose passions are already extinguished by
age, infirmities, or reverses of fortune.” He propounds a morality that would
also again be echoed loudly be the great figures we will turn to next,
D’Holbach, Diderot and their large following, that: “virtue is an advantage and
vice is an injury to beings of our species”. Many observations and arguments
came first from this lonely pastor. If he were alive today he would be one of
the many secret atheist pastors who are attended to by the modern clergy
project.
D’Holbach, Diderot,Helvetius:
“Christianity: Unveiled” of the 1760s was pretty much the first published public
work dedicated to attacking Christianity and its morals. “The System of Nature”
came out in 1770 and has been called the atheist bible. It was the most
systematic work of philosophical atheism ever written, and perhaps still is. It
was a phenomenon that spread through Europe and beyond, provoking all sorts of
public rebuttals from prominent figures, as well as more secretive approvals.
Both these works were written by Paul Henri Baron D”Holbach and were at the head
of a flurry of atheistic books and pamphlets which flooded Europe in the 1770s
and 1780s. D’Holbach, who avoided the book and man burning censors by
attributing his works to dead friends, was also the owner of the salon in France
that was the center of the intellectual world for decades and welcomed other
immensely influential atheist philosophers like David Hume (who Dawkins actually
did know about) and possibly Jeremy Bentham as well as all sorts of famous
people from all over the world including skeptics like Benjamin Franklin and
Edward Gibbon of “The Decline and Fall of The Roman Empire” fame. Atheism was
the prime doctrine.
Denis Diderot is widely considered the third biggest name of the Enlightenment
after Voltaire and Rousseau. Chief editor of the great Encyclopedia, he started
a deist and ended up being a staunch atheist (a fact unknown by Dawkins in his
Diderot “God Delusion” reference)and partner in crime of D’Holbach’s (who
contributed many scientific articles to the Encyclopedia) for many years, one of
the boldest and most original writers of his era. He wrote passionate tracts
against slavery. He added poetry to his philosophy with atheistic works like
“D’Alembert’s Dream” spreading widely. He rounded out his theory of evolution in
Elements de Physiologie in 1774, and incorrectly predicted in 1783 that belief
in God and submission to kings would everywhere be at an end within a few years.
He conceived of nature as a half-blind, half-intelligent power operating on
matter and making it take a million experimental forms, improving this organ,
discarding that one, giving birth and death creatively in a cosmic laboratory
where thousands of species have appeared and dissapeared, and if she has any
purpose or meaning it is unknown, we are among her transient and infinitesimal
sports
Jean Claude Adrain Helvetius was a member of the D’Holbach circle who died early
but whose work made an immense impact far after he was gone. His wife kept his
ideas going, hosting her own salon, a prime meeting spot for philosophers and
thinkers, decades after he passed. In his De l’Homme he attacked priests as
venal peddlers of hope and fear, perpetrators of ignorance, and murderers of
thought, much in the same way Thomas Jefferson would do after him. He points out
that religious asceticism or devotion may appear virtuous, but it is only a
long-term investment in celestial securities and that if there were a god he
would be more likely to be the author of human reason than a particular book. He
agreed with another friend of D’Holbach, Nicolas Boulanger, in his Antiquity
Unveiled, that religion arose through primitive man’s fears of floods and other
apparently supernatural catastrophes, later organized by kings and priests to
sanctify tyranny. Helvetius inspired many educational reforms. Cesare Beccaria
testified that the works of Helvetius inspired him to write his historic plea
for reform of penal law and policy. Bentham and William Godwin stated they owed
much to him for their ideas on justice and seeking morality and the greatest
happiness of the greatest number in legislation. Mary Wollstonecraft was led to
compose her Rights of Woman (1792) partly by Helvetius’ claim that the
intellectual inequalities between the sexes were largely due to inequalities of
education and opportunity, The National Convention of the French Revolution,
which we turn to next, in 1792 certified its sense of Helvetius’ influence by
giving his daughters the title filles de la nation.
Atheists of the French Revolution:
Jonathan Israel and others chronicle these French atheists during and just
before the French Revolution. Not all were great people, but most of them were,
and many had a direct part in the “liberty, equality, fraternity”, the tolerance
and cosmopolitanism that shaped the modern world:Condorcet, Sophie Condorcet,
Volney, Mirabeau, Sylvain Marechal, Brissot, Jauqes Hebert, D’Alembert, Pierre
Gaspard Chaumette, Naigeon, Grimm, John Oswald, Mathew Stewart, Anacharsis
Cloots, La Mettrie, Francois Chabot, Lequino, Fouche, Camille Desmoulins,
Bourdon, Dupont, Fabre dEglantine, Momoro, Dumont, Alexandre Deleyre, Augustin
Roux, and Weishaupt aside from the names already mentioned, of which there were
many more. Some of the names here were also previously involved in the DHolbach
circle and the creation of the Encyclopedia.
The French Revolution actually did away with Christianity, it invented a new
calendar and ditched the Christian one. There were festivals of Reason. Churches
were closed and re-purposed. While some of this went too far and was done
forcefully, the “Reign of Terror” was headed by the anti-atheist Robespierre who
despised the works of the “Radical” Enlightenment, the egalitarian atheist works
of D’Holbach, Diderot, Raynal, and Helvetius that so inspired the great ideals
of the Revolution. When I played the game “Assassin’s Creed: Unity” which takes
place during the French Revolution (and which has an explicitly atheistic
message,the ending speech having the main character stating: “There is no
Supreme Being”), it has one chapter set at the festival of the Supreme Being
which Robespierre instituted to counter the atheistic and reason-exalting
tendencies still existent in the revolution, he is seen constantly preaching
against atheism in the game. It was as humorous as it was accurate…
—
From the classical world to today, the supremely rich tradition of replacing
revelation with investigation, which includes atheists, deists, agnostics,
freethinkers, and humanists, has been the single most transformative and
impactful tradition in human history, the life blood of progress. The
Enlightenment, the crescendo that made Darwin possible, wasn’t always purely
atheistic, but it was almost always irreligious. Indeed it had to be, as
religion was indeed at the core of what had to be fought to obtain knowledge,
liberty, and amelioration. The giants upon whose shoulders we stand were rarely
seen bowing, knowing that to do so meant to spill out the ambrosia that had been
so bloodily wrestled from the gods, and there were indeed many who outright
cursed them.
Quotes from and about the Atheists Before Darwin:
“Some have made the love of God the foundation of morality. If we did a good act
merely from love of God and a belief that it is pleasing to Him, whence arises
the morality of the Atheist? Diderot, D’Holbach, Condorcet, D’Alembert are known
to have been among the most virtuous of men…Their virtue, then, must have had
some other foundation than the love of God.”-Thomas Jefferson, to Thomas Law,
June 13, 1814
“Epicurus’s old questions are still unanswered: Is he (God) willing to prevent
evil, but not able? then he is impotent. Is he able, but not willing? then he is
malevolent. Is he both able and willing? then whence evil?” – David Hume
“The word God ought to be banished from the language of all those who desire to
speak to be understood. These are abstract words, invented by ignorance; they
are only calculated to satisfy men lacking in experience, men too idle or too
timid to study nature and its ways.” -Baron D”Holbach, The System of Nature,
1770
“Men always deceive themselves by abandoning experience to follow imaginary
systems. The beings which he pictures to himself as above nature, or
distinguished from her, are always chimeras formed after that which he has
already seen. There is not, there can be nothing outside of that nature which
includes all beings.” – Baron D’Holbach, The System of Nature
“Nature is self-existent. She produces everything. Contains within herself he
cause of everything. Her motion is a necessary consequence of her existence.
Within herself she contains the remedies for all those who are patiently willing
to investigate her laws.” – Baron D’Holbach, The System of Nature
“If we go back to the beginning we shall find that ignorance and fear created
the gods; that fancy, enthusiasm, or deceit adorned or disfigured them; that
weakness worships them; that credulity preserves them, and that custom, respect
and tyranny support them in order to make the blindness of man serve its own
interests.” – Baron D’Holbach, The System of Nature
“Have men then need of a God whom they know not, of an invisible legislator, of
a mysterious religion and of chimerical fears, in order to learn that every
excess evidently tends to destroy them, that to preserve health they must be
temperate; that to gain the love of others it is necessary to do them good, that
to do them evil is a sure means to incur their vengeance and hatred?… It
suffices that man needs his fellow-creature, in order to know that he must fear
to excite sentiments unfavourable to himself. Thus the feeling and thinking
being has only to feel and think, in order to discover what he must do for
himself and others. I feel, and another feels like me; this is the foundation of
all morals.” – Baron D’Holbach, Good Sense
“Whether God exists or does not exist, He has come to rank among the most
sublime and useless truths.” – Denis Diderot
“A nation which thinks that it is belief in God and not good law which makes
people honest does not seem to me very advanced.” – Denis Diderot
“If you want me to believe in God, you must make me touch him.” – Denis Diderot
“Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of
the last priest.” -Denis Diderot (possibly taken from Jean Meslier)
“For if men will not think for themselves, it remains only for them to take the
opinions they have imbibed from their grandmothers, mothers, or priests. But
taking that method they can only be right by chance; whereas by thinking and
examination they have not only the mere accident of being in the right but have
the evidence of things to determine them to the side of truth.” -Anthony
Collins, A Discourse on Freethinking, 1713
“There is no God.”- Percy Bysshe Shelley (one of the greatest English poets,
husband of Frankenstein creator Mary Shelley, daughter of feminist writer Mary
Wollstonecraft and atheist philosopher William Godwin), The Necessity of
Atheism, 1811 opening line
“The being called God bears every mark of a veil woven by conceit, to hide the
ignorance of men even from themselves. The threads of its texture is the
anthropomorphism of the vulgar. They prostrate themselves and pray because their
fathers taught them to prostrate themselves and pray. – Percy Bysshe Shelley,
The Necessity of Atheism
“If God has spoken, why is the universe unconvinced?” – Percy Bysshe Shelley,
The Necessity of Atheism
“Every time we say the God is the cause of some phenomenon, that signifies that
we are ignorant of how such a phenomenon was caused by the forces of nature.” –
Percy Bysshe Shelley, Queen Mab, 1813
“It is among men of genius and science that atheism alone is found. Every
reflecting mind must acknowledge that there is no proof of the existence of a
deity.” – Percy Bysshe Shelley, A Refutation of Deism, 1814
“Christianity peoples earth with demons, hell with men, and heaven with
slaves.” – Percy Bysshe Shelley, A Refutation of Deism, 1814
See:
http://www.ftarchives.net/holbach/good/gcontents.htm
[http://www.ftarchives.net/holbach/good/gcontents.htm] Good Sense- D’Holbach,
1772
https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/disbelieve-it-or-not-ancient-history-suggests-that-atheism-is-as-natural-to-humans-as-religion
[https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/disbelieve-it-or-not-ancient-history-suggests-that-atheism-is-as-natural-to-humans-as-religion]
Atheism as natural as belief
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_atheism
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_atheism] History of Atheism
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2J232lPZno] A History of Disbelief, BBC
http://launchistory.blogspot.com/2012/04/theory-of-evolution-in-ancient-greece.html
[https://launchistory.blogspot.com/2012/04/theory-of-evolution-in-ancient-greece.html]
Evolution, Ancient Greece
